SpletIn S v Heita and Others9 Levy J (as he then was) held that the provisions of section , 2 of the Terrorism Act10 were in conflict with Article 4 of Annexure 1 to Proclamation R101 and … http://namibialii.org/na/cases/NAHCMD/2013/93.html
S v Strong (1) (CC 16 of 2024) [2024] NAHCMD 49 (13 February
SpletS v Malumo and others (2) 2007 (1) NR 198 (HC) S v Kazondandona 2007 (2) NR 394 (HC) S v Nunes 2001 NR 43 (HC) Search and seizure De Jager v Government of the Republic of Namibia and Another 2006 (1) NR 198 (HC) S v Malumo and Others (2) 2007 (1) NR 198 (HC) Swanepoel v Minister of Home Affairs and Others 2000 NR 93 (HC) SpletSee Salt and Another v Smith 1990 NR 87. It has also been said that there can be no urgency where the urgency is self-created by the culpable remissness on the part of the applicant. (Bergman v Commercial Bank of Namibia Ltd and Another 2001 NR 45). [3] In the instant case, the applicant was aware as long ago as 10 April 2012 that an eviction car battery for kia ceed
South Africa: Supreme Court of Appeal decisions beginning with S ...
Splet09. apr. 2013 · Upon the authority of Salt and Another v Smith 1990 NR 87 I accept Ms Schulz’s argument. Nevertheless, I decided to hear the matter in order to get it out of the way on account of the fact that (a) the application has, with respect, not one iota of merit and (b) the matter has been making its rounds in the court as long ago as 2007 during ... SpletCASE NO. CA 17/96. IN THE HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA In the matter between DANIeL HEITA. versus THE STATE. CORAM: FRANK, J. et MTAMBANENGWE, J. Heard on: … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/toc-S.html broadway limited imports california zephyr